Neil deGrasse Tyson on intelligent design

Tyson doesn’t simply deride the ID position. He shows that, in each scientific era, the ID position has been the de facto explanation for things scientists cannot yet get their heads around.

Advertisements

Posted on March 12, 2012, in Arguments for atheism. Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: